The hospital before the hospital.
The problem
For years, medicine is something you watch.
Then one day, it's your call.
Five gaps no exam can close
Limited patient exposure
Limited faculty time
Fear of making mistakes
Lack of repetition
No standardization
Every other tool trains what you know. The gap is everything you haven't done.
How it works
One patient, start to finish.
Under fifteen minutes.
Inside the encounter
A clinical instrument, not a quiz.
Live patient encounter
Talk to a patient that talks back.
They answer in their own words — and never hand you the diagnosis. Ask the right questions, or you'll miss it.
Every test has a cost
Order what matters. Unnecessary investigations cost rupees and marks — just like real practice.
Deterministic scoring
Scores are computed by logic, not vibes. The system only writes the debrief — it never decides your grade.
A debrief that actually teaches.
See your domain breakdown, what you missed, the correct answer, the guideline, and an educator's narrative — after every encounter.
The case library
Five specialties. Every presentation that matters.
Internal Medicine
The backbone of clinical training
10 sub-specialties · 100 cases
Surgery
When a presentation becomes operative
10 sub-specialties · 100 cases
Paediatrics
History through a parent, not the patient
8 sub-specialties · 100 cases
Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Women's health & obstetric risk
7 sub-specialties · 100 cases
Emergency Medicine
Highest-stakes, least-supervised
8 sub-specialties · 100 cases
Clinical rigour
Every case, reviewed by a doctor.
More than a question bank. Every case is authored to a clinical schema, reviewed by qualified doctors, and mapped to the guidelines you're examined on.
Reviewed by a panel of qualified doctors before release
Checked by a practising clinician before release.
Tied to the competencies you're examined on.
Logic sets your score — never software.
For faculty & institutions
See how every student thinks — at cohort scale.
The same encounters students learn from roll up into a supervision and governance layer — so a college can standardise clinical exposure, spot who's struggling, and prove it.
Cohort analytics
Competency heatmaps across students, batches and departments — beyond a single exam score.
Standardised exposure
Every learner meets the same rare presentations — STEMI, meningitis, DKA — regardless of what walks into the ward.
Faculty review
Replay any encounter, assess competencies, assign cases, and surface at-risk learners early.
Accreditation-ready
NMC-mapped, exportable reporting — student, batch, department and institution, to PDF and Excel.
Proof it works
Confidence you can measure.
I froze on my first STEMI here — in the simulator, not on the ward. That's exactly the point.
I've worked through more emergencies in a month than in a whole year of rotations.
For the first time I can see how a student reasons — not just what they scored.
The debrief tells me exactly what I missed and why. No lecture has ever done that.
I stopped being scared of the acute take. By then I'd already done it fifty times.
It flagged that I over-ordered investigations — something no exam ever picked up.
We use it to standardise OSCE prep across the whole batch. The data is invaluable.
The voice patient makes you take a proper history — you genuinely can't shortcut it.
Evidence & trust
Built to be trusted — end to end.
The score is defensible, the system stays in its lane, and every student's data stays where it belongs.
Guideline-aligned
Every decision is compared to current guidelines — NICE, WHO, ICMR, ACC/AHA, ESC — showing what's recommended, why, and where your reasoning differed.
Software never grades you
Scores are computed by logic, not a language model. The system only writes the debrief — and the simulated patient can never reveal the diagnosis.
Private & secure
Student data is isolated per institution, encrypted in transit, and gated by role-based access. One college never sees another's.
Why SYNTAX
Nothing else does all of this.
Question banks test recall. Flashcards drill facts. A chatbot answers your questions — SYNTAX makes you answer for your decisions, then scores them.
| Question banks | Flashcards | Chatbots | SYNTAX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immersive patient interaction | – | – | ◐ | |
| Voice-based conversation | – | – | ◐ | |
| Clinical reasoning, not recall | ◐ | – | ◐ | |
| Structured consultant feedback | – | – | – | |
| Longitudinal competency tracking | ◐ | ◐ | – | |
| Faculty analytics & governance | ◐ | – | – |
From ₹1,999 / month.
Try for ₹999 · student plans · institution licences — a plan for every stage.
FAQ
Questions, answered.
What is SYNTAX and how does it work?
SYNTAX is a clinical-reasoning simulator. You walk into a simulated encounter, take a history by voice, examine the patient, order investigations, commit to a diagnosis and a management plan — then get a consultant-style debrief scored against current guidelines. It's the whole clinical encounter, not a quiz.
Does SYNTAX replace hospital rotations?
No. It isn't a substitute for real patients — it prepares you to engage more effectively with real care by giving you deliberate practice beforehand.
How is it different from a chatbot?
The technology is invisible. The patient is a coherent simulated clinical case — not a script or an assistant — and every encounter ends in a structured, consultant-style assessment.
Are there any multiple-choice questions?
Never. You behave like a junior doctor — holding natural voice conversations and making real clinical decisions.
How is my performance assessed?
Through consultant-style reviews across nine dimensions and multiple competencies — with strengths, weaknesses and recommendations, not a single grade. The score itself is computed deterministically.
Which guidelines inform the feedback?
Your decisions are compared against current recommendations including NICE, WHO, ICMR, ACC/AHA and ESC.
Is student data kept private?
Yes. Role-based access, institution-level data isolation and encryption in transit mean each role sees only what it should.